Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Sense Perception & Knowledge of the External World

3. To see, 'what is the case', what is required?  Please define each term. 

Context, inference, concepts, experience, and interpretation are required. Context is the background information that is needed to figure out "what is the case". Inference is using our prior knowledge and experience to make an educated conclusion. Concepts, like basic laws of nature and life are needed to see what is the case as well.  Experience in life is needed, which gives more background knowledge and also a deeper understanding. Interpretation is also required, that is using what you know to try and understand something. You need to make sense of information you're given.

4. What did Nietzsche mean by 'the fallacy of the immaculate perception'?  How does psychologist, Joseph Jastrow prove this point?  When have we done this in class?

Nietzsche meant that perception is not definite, you can’t look at something once and know that it is the one and only correct way to perceive that thing. You have to add to your sense datum in order to gather enough information. Jastrow proves this point with an image that can be seen as either a duck or a rabbit, depending on how you look at it. In class last week we did a perception test that showed blocks, which depending on how you looked at, appeared as 6 or 7 blocks, but not both at the same time.


7. What does Abel mean when he says, "to perceive is to solve a problem"?

When we perceive we are trying to figure out what we are sensing.  We gather different types of sense datum, using our brain to arrange the data we have and disregard stimuli, to assign color, shape, etc. to what we are seeing.


8. What is the role of social conditioning in determining how things 'naturally look'? 

Every society has their own ideas about perception and the way things “naturally look”. Distortions and abstractions are part of the society and they people in the society aren’t aware of these flaws in their perception.


9. What is significant about the Durer rhinoceros story?  How was the influence of 'convention' influence perspective drawing?

The significance of the rhinoceros story is how much people can be influenced by convention. Durer was influenced  by and relied on his imagination and 2nd hand information when he made his model of a rhinoceros, and James Bruce was influenced not only by Durer's model but also how his own perception and idea of how a rhinoceros should look, rather than what he was seeing. Convention influences perspective drawing because many people when drawing, draw what they want to see, or feel they should see, rather than what they really see. They are influenced by convention of perspective. 


11. What does Abel mean when he write, "believing is seeing"?  How may this point be seen in the study of the natural versus the social sciences?

Abel means that if we believe something enough in or minds, either we've been taught it or been convinced that something is true, we can convince ourselves that we see what we believe. This can be true even if what we think we see, isn't what we're actually seeing. A social science example is that there are people who can convince others that 2 unequal lines are equal, because they believe that they are equal so much that they see it. In natural sciences there are many examples of people being influenced by what they believe, that convince them that they see things that aren't there. Many astronomers were convinced that they saw a planet "Vulcan" in the sky, but that planet does not exist. They convinced themselves that the planet existed, and then were able to "see" it. 


Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Reading reflection on "What every baby knows"

    1. The meaning of "inferential learning mechanisms"
                           Inferential learning mechanisms are the "theories" that new born babies have about the world from the beginning. They are able to edit and revise these theories as they gain more knowledge.

    1. The changes that occur over the first three years of life (instinctual ability to "distinguish human faces and voices", "understanding that people's actions, emotions and perceptions can be directed at a separate external world", and "understanding that people have different beliefs")
                         Instinctively from birth babies are able to distinguish human faces and voices and within a few days they are able to recognize familiar faces, voices and smells. At about 9 months they can tell the difference between happiness and sadness and anger, and which tone of voice goes with which expression. At around 1 babies begin to understand that other people's actions, emotions and perceptions can be directed at an external world. They can understand pointing and react based on the actions of the people around them. The knowledge of different people having different beliefs doesn't come until about 3 years old. 

    1. The assumptions and implications of the article quote, "Babies are like little scientists continually overthrowing theories that no longer fit the evidence.”
                         This quote assumes that from birth babies are capable of pretty high level thinking. It implies that they are able to consciously decide what the "evidence" that they collect means and how it affects their theories. It also implies that babies are able to think without the language that we know and use, that these theories must be in their minds but not expressed in words. 

Monday, November 5, 2012

Intuition & Knowledge



1. What is meant by "reading thin slices"?

Reading thing slices is judging something or someone based on small and quick knowledge of it.


2. Explain intuitive expertise

Intuitive expertise is our mind knowing more information and more quickly knowing information than our conscious mind can. We rely on this knowledge for automatically processing information every day. As we gain more knowledge, our intuition is able to make automatic decisions on something that used to be a reasoned decision of our conscious mind.


3.What are the perils of relying on intuition?

Relying on our intuition can have severe consequences. Our intuition gives us false confidence on a decision, and also makes us fear the wrong things. False confidence can become a huge problem, especially if it leads to make wrong assumptions and therefor cause us to choose a decision that should be thought through. Fearing the wrong things can also be a problem. Our intuition can tell us that something is dangerous, but the alternative could be even more dangerous. It's always a good idea to think decisions through, not just rely on our intuition because facts are more concrete.


4. Is intuition a fair justification for mistakes made in decision-making? Give reasons and examples to support your answer?

I think it depends on the situation if intuition is a fair justification for mistakes made in decision making or not. If you're using your intuition to make a decision that doesn't have a big consequence if you're wrong, then I think it is a fair justification. For example if you use your intuition to make a bet, but you only gamble a dollar or two, even if your decision is wrong and you lose the bet, there's a small consequence and your intuition is a fair justification. However if you shoot someone because your intuition tells you that this person could possibly be the person you're looking for, like in the Diallo case, the stakes are extremely high and intuition alone isn't enough to justify a mistake that cost an innocent life.

    Monday, October 29, 2012

    Hidden Assumptions


          1. How did you react to your results?  Were you surprised?  Angry or hurt? Pleased?  Discuss what you felt and why you think you felt what you did.

    I was a little surprised of my results, but not really angry or hurt. I knew that the results of course aren't 100% accurate, so I didn't take the results as explicitly saying I'm racist or judgmental. I think I felt like that because  of my opinion on tests like this one, they are never 100% accurate. 

           2. Do you believe that your test results say something about you that you should pay attention to?  Why or why not?

    I honestly don't think the test results say something about me, because the only mistakes I made were just when I went to fast and didn't give myself time to process the information. I don't think the results necessarily mean I prefer one group over another.

            3. Do you think that these tests are valid?  When you first saw your results, did you question or accept the tests' validity?

    I can see how the test could be an indicator of maybe subconscious preference but I didn't take the results as the absolute truth.  I think I did question the validity especially when the test said I moderately prefer thin people to fat people because the truth is that really believe that weight doesn't define a person at all. I don't think I've ever preferred someone simply because they're skinnier than another person, so that made me question the results. 

            4. Give examples of the cultural messages that may support attitudes linking a dominant group in your nation or culture with "good" or "superior" attributes and a subordinate group with "bad" or "inferior" ones. Are these attitudes generalizations that can be called stereotypes?  How can generalizations be distinguished from stereotypes?

    I think that magazines in particular, and fashion ads, give messages that support skinny people, because you rarely see anyone large in them. I think that they are sometimes portrayed as being superior because that body type is more shown to be the most attractive. I also think that some attitudes society has in general towards some nationalities or ethnicities could be considered stereotypes. Some people are in a state of mind where they think that one trait applies to a whole group of people, no exceptions, and in my opinion that's a stereotype. A generalization is different in my opinion because I think that's when someone believes a trait usually applies to a certain group of people, but they don't assume or expect that every person within that group has that trait. 

            5. If some of our consciously held beliefs, attitudes, and values are undermined by what Gladwell, another writer we'll be reading soon....http://www.gladwell.com/blink/index.html, calls 'rapid cognition' (others call this 'intuitive thinking' or even 'gut feelings'), what do you suggest we can do to combat jumping to (false) conclusions?

    I'm not sure if it's possible to stop jumping to conclusions. It seems, and is backed up in the readings, that subconsciously we all have rapid cognition, and we can't turn it off. It's human nature and we can't really control it. I think we can try and slow ourselves down before making a conclusion and that may help, but I don't think we can make it so that our subconscious has no say in how we feel about a conclusion. 

    Tuesday, October 23, 2012

    What is TOK? Why TOK

    What is TOK?

    TOK is the Theory Of Knowledge. I think TOK is basically exploring how a person knows things, and how they know that the information that they think they know, is true and why.



    Why TOK?

    TOK teaches people to think in depth, and critically think. It requires a lot of thought to analyze how we know things, rather than just accept what we are told all the time.

    Wednesday, September 12, 2012

    Self as a knower

    I think I am most reflected by Mathematics and Reason.

    I chose mathematics as my AOK because I think I'm a math oriented person. I try to relate most of what I learn to mathematics, it comes relatively easy to me and feels very natural. It helps me a lot in soccer, it allows me to figure out where the ball will go if I kick it with a certain amount of force in a certain direction. Mathematics plays a large role in my academics as well, obviously in math, but also in other subjects such as Business and Chemistry which I immediately seem to relate to math.

    The WOK I chose is reason. I think almost every decision I make, I use reason. I rarely let my emotions make take over, I mostly rely on concrete facts and i try to analyze what the effects of my decision will be. In almost every subject in school reason is the main way I answer questions, especially in History, Chemistry and TOK.